Looks like the wheels are finally coming off the stranger.

Hairy armpits on women is an empirical turn-off. Or conversely for those that love it. Nothing patriarchal or societal conditioning about it. That's junk science.

So sad that this will be behind a paywall in the future. Dan might be able to get away with it since he has a loyal fan base and some of them will cough up 40 bucks, but that's probably a very small percentage of folks who NEED the advice, but will no longer be able to access it or stumble across it....

Any societal conditions at play for those who are not turned on my hairy genital areas?

*.... turned on BY genital areas.

So when a letter writer isn't a subscriber they can only benefit from Dan's reply, not the (in my opinion) equally important comments?

In any case, I'm not sure I can afford to stay onboard.