Comments

1

If it's a smear campaign for a uncolobbrated tale against Rev. Warnock for a then 12-year-old kid subjected to golden showers and forced to sleep outside for bedwetting, it also must have been a smear campaign against Bret Kavanaugh when a former classmate had uncolobbrated memory of being sexually assaulted.

2

"Uncolobbrated"? Go to bed, Raindrip - you're drunk again...

3

@2: How cute, you made hay on a copy/paste error typo.

5

Holy shit, do you really think they are comparable? Seriously? Stop being so fucking intellectually lazy, dipshit. Is the internet really that hard for you to use?

Fuck, look at the cases. Warnock was the pastor of Douglas Memorial Community Church in Baltimore. The church operated the camp. A camper said that a counselor at Camp Farthest Out forced him to spend the night sleeping outside as punishment for wetting the bed when he was 12 years old, and that counselors also doused him with urine. Police never said that Warnock committed the crime, or even knew about it. Warnock insisted that the accused get legal representation. Investigators thanked Warnock for his help. https://www.ajc.com/politics/politics-blog/republicans-raise-warnocks-2002-arrest-as-senate-runoffs-heat-up/S6IE4QX5ERCLVP3IKBSUVMNIC4/

No one is accusing Warnock of any wrong doing -- not even the camper!

In contrast, Brett Kavanaugh is accused of rape, and the allegations are damn credible. Kavanaugh's statements about his excessive drinking were obviously false, as was most of his testimony. But there anything, he is being accused of the actual crime, instead of hiring someone who committed a crime.

The point is, if you believe all of the allegations, Warnock did nothing wrong, and Kavanaugh should have served serious time, and never become a lawyer, let alone judge.

8

@2: They're both smear campaigns where the accused ended up being exonerated and the accusers are partisans taking advantage of loose facts. I prefer Warnock to win, but they're are both comparable in the annals of political smear campaigns.

@7: Yet you're reading my commentary.

9

*8.1 refers to 5.

10

But yes, it was an inept comparison. Pardon the shower.

11

@1: Covfefe!!!

@2 COMTE and @4 Garb Garbler: I keep warning Rainy about mixing hydroxychloroquine into his dangerously high sugar intake, but he won't listen.


Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.